OS X Bibliographic Management

A search of Google groups reveals that the issue of OS X bibliographic
management software hasn't come up in some time.

Specifically, I have tried using EndNote and BookEnds on OS X, and like
both for different reasons: outstanding support and integration with
Mellel from BookEnds, and industry standardization (positive and
negative) in EndNote. EndNote was sluggish on my machine, and I ended
up getting a refund for the product and returning it. I'm switching to
BookEnds.

What are your opinions on the state of OS X bib managers and which
products are you using/recommending?

In article ,
Dana Leighton < > wrote:

 > A search of Google groups reveals that the issue of OS X bibliographic
 > management software hasn't come up in some time.
 >
 > Specifically, I have tried using EndNote and BookEnds on OS X, and like
 > both for different reasons: outstanding support and integration with
 > Mellel from BookEnds, and industry standardization (positive and
 > negative) in EndNote. EndNote was sluggish on my machine, and I ended
 > up getting a refund for the product and returning it. I'm switching to
 > BookEnds.
 >
 > What are your opinions on the state of OS X bib managers and which
 > products are you using/recommending?

One of my colleagues here did considerable testing of each against the
other, and strongly favored BookEnds over EndNotes, even though he had
used EndNote for a long time.

When I looked up the reviews of each in VersionTracker the general
consensus followed your and his findings. (And perhaps one could say
there was a substantial outpouring of opinion against EndNote, matched
by a similar but opposite emotion for BookEnds.)

--
Address is munged to foil spambots.
Change the "invalid" to org.